LETTER: State terrorism in East Timor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr Peter Carey
Sir: The British government's outrage at the European Court's judgment on the Gibraltar killings, and its declared commitment to combating terrorism worldwide, are hard to reconcile with its record of support for state terrorism elsewhere in the world.
Twenty years ago this year, the former Portuguese colony of East Timor was brutally invaded by the Indonesian military, who have been directly responsible for the death of perhaps as many as a third of the pre-1975 population of 700,000.
Yet, in that same period, Britain has become Indonesia's principal foreign arms supplier, providing a range of sophisticated weapons (including British Aerospace Hawk ground-attack aircraft) which have been used against East Timorese civilians. Training has also been provided in Britain for Indonesian officers from both army and paramilitary (Brimob Mobile Brigade) police units, some of which have subsequently seen service in East Timor and have been responsible for gross human rights abuses.
Following the Indonesian invasion, Britain voted for two Security Council regulations calling for the immediate withdrawal of all Indonesian troops and the holding of a popular referendum on the future of the former Portuguese territory. The fact that to this day neither of these demands have been acceded to by Jakarta is largely the responsibility of Indonesia's Western "friends", like Britain, who have been knowing accomplices in its terror regime. In this day and age, is the only honour left that of thieves?
Yours sincerely
Peter Carey
Fellow and Tutor in
Modern History
Trinity College, Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments