Letter: Social science
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lewis Wolpert writes as if the scientist is simply the blameless messenger, or actor (Review, 26 January). Don't blame him or her: he or she doesn't write the script, or choose what to write about. Nature plus autonomous, disinterested, reason and observation - others might say, society and culture - largely do that.
Is this bad faith: a blatant case of passing the buck? More likely, science is a bit of both, nature and culture acting together, in consonance as well as dissonance. Attempts to examine and disen- tangle them will always be reflexive and problematic. But, with the aid of the critical philosophy and social science Professor Wolpert evidently knows little about, yet spurns, they will also be enlightening and vital in ways he has still to see.
Richard Friend
London SE5
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments