Letter: Saudi nurses
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: We must all applaud Robin Cook's protest to the Saudis that their proposed punishments of Lucille McLauchlan and Deborah Perry are inappropriate for the 20th century. This, though true, is not the main issue.
The real issue is that Saudi court procedures offend natural justice. I understand that, under Saudi Arabian law, the word of women is totally discounted in court. Even the women's legal counsel says he still does not know the evidence against them. In short, the verdict was arrived at in such a way that nobody can possibly know whether the two nurses are guilty or not. We should therefore assume that they are innocent.
Some will say that the Saudis are simply applying Islamic law. Saudi and Islamic law are, however, not at all the same thing. Besides, the issue is not one of law, but of justice and morality, and any rational person, no matter what his beliefs or religion, can see that these have been violated.
Graham
Dunstan Martin
Edinburgh
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments