Letter: NHS suffering from efficiency savings

Dr K. G. Taylor
Sunday 30 August 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article of 25 August ('More is not always better') on the subject of NHS funding or, rather, underfunding may have left your readers misinformed. The Office of Health Economics (OHE) report states that 6.1 per cent of GDP in the UK is spent on health. This is significantly less than our peer nations. By all means let us be efficient but let us not excuse failure to fund adequately on false assumptions about efficiency.

The NHS has suffered about seven years of so-called 1 per cent recurrent efficiency savings on top of underfunded inflation and pay awards. Initially the service made savings on cleaning bills and food and later closed wards and laid off nursing staff.

Acute hospitals are currently unable to offer new treatments without stopping doing something else. If the hospital's deficit looks significant, wards are closed and patients rushed through the remaining beds faster. Money is not following the patients. From my experience more patients are being treated but some health authorities are refusing to pay up.

Unemployment and poverty are increasing in 1992. There is a direct relationship between unemployment as an indicator of socio- economic deprivation and hospital admissions. Greater numbers of hospital beds and longer lengths of stay could have a common cause in increased medical need related to poverty as described in the Black Report.

The Office of Health Economics report also highlighted the relatively high infant mortality rate in the UK in relation to comparable nations, and this is a key indicator of medical welfare. The other interesting feature is that spending on private health is rising three times as fast as NHS

expenditure.

Yours faithfully,

K. G. TAYLOR

Halesowen,

West Midlands

27 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in