Letter: NHS cannot treat everyone
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CONGRATULATIONS on your excellent editorial 'Hard choices on health' (17 April). As a consultant who has recently retired from the NHS, I have lived through the plethora of management 'reforms' that have dogged its history and, in my opinion, have deprived it of proper development. The most recent is the most radical; and has advantages and disadvantages. But all miss the point by ignoring the basic problem.
Given the explosion of knowledge and technical ability in the last 50 years, the 'demand' for health care (in terms of conditions that can now be treated) must exceed the supply (in terms of 'resources' such as expertise and money). Thus there must be rationing.
It is the function of politicians to determine the policy of the NHS - who or what conditions should be treated; and, more importantly, who and what will not be treated within the NHS. It is not acceptable that they should mislead the public by implying that all treatments are available for all the people all the time.
The onerous task of deciding who will or will not be treated should not be placed on the individual doctor (as it has been) or the local manager. Nor should the local 'purchasers' (none of whom are elected) have to decide which type of treatments (and how many) they will buy on behalf of their resident population.
If the NHS is to be a 'national' service, then whether you will get treated, or not, should not be determined by where you live.
M C T Morrison
Consultant Orthopaedic
Surgeon
Swindon, Wiltshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments