Letter: Indigenous people count
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IN Matthew Brace's article "Where tourists may not tread" (25 January), I feel that part of the argument over whether tourism is a positive or negative force for conservation has been neglected. That is, namely, the value that indigenous people place on their natural resources.
If, as suggested, areas of high biodiversity and conservation interest become no-go areas for tourists and local people, they effectively lose their economic value. Once the area does not produce revenue, and local people are not allowed to gather food or building materials from the site, it effectively becomes a wasteland, and becomes prey to poaching and uncontrolled exploitation.
In the West we are in a position to be able to judge that the instrinsic value of tropical rainforests is greater than their value as timber, or that the social intelligence of elephants makes them inherently priceless. What we are not so good at is answering the questions posed by those living in contact with tropical forests (whose resources they have used for thousands of years) or elephants (who raid crops, and kill people).
Carefully controlled and monitored tourism can be a positive factor in the conservation of some rare and fragile habitats by supporting local economies. But local communities must be able to participate.
Anna Spenceley, MSc
Royston, Hertfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments