Letter: 'Britannia' is not a matter of national pride
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.As a mariner (Master) I am pleased that the powers have apparently decided to replace the royal yacht when the present Britannia completes her long and, I think, distinguished service ("Labour won't pay for Britannia", 26 January).
However, I view the timing of this announcement with considerable scepticism. Is it another ploy by a fraught government to curry favour, with a belated token of commitment to our beleaguered maritime services which have suffered so diabolically during the 17 years of Thatcherite ideology?
A minister referring to this government's commitment to our maritime heritage is blatant hypocrisy when the Conservatives have presided over the destruction of our once great and proud Merchant Navy.
It is reassuring to know that any new building will take place in a British yard - do we still have the capacity?
Captain Anthony S Young
Hornsea, East Yorkshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments