Letter: A home birth can end up in hospital, but it is worth the risk
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: A home birth can end up in hospital, but it is worth the risk
ANY PRESSURE exerted by the small minority who campaign for home and natural births is minute compared with that exerted by the majority, including most of the medical profession, who believe hospital birth to be the only sensible option. I chose home birth for both my daughters and was subjected each time to nine months of opprobrium.
It is not the life-saving Caesarean which is a cause for concern to those promoting natural birth but the relentless increase in non-emergency (often unnecessary) surgery and other invasive techniques employed in hospital births. If we continue to follow the US it may become illegal for a woman to give birth at home. No woman should be made to feel guilty for the type of birth she either chooses or ends up having, but to deny that choice is tragic and dangerous.
Kate Wilson
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments