Jennifer Lopez sued for $150,000 by paparazzi for posting photo of herself
Singer shared the photo of herself and Alex Rodriquez to Instagram in 2017
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Jennifer Lopez is being sued for copyright infringement for posting a photo of herself taken by paparazzi to her Instagram account.
The federal lawsuit was filed by Splash News and Picture Agency for $150,000 over a picture of Lopez holding hands with Alex Rodriguez in New York City, which the singer shared to her Instagram account in 2017.
According to court documents obtained by E! News, the picture agency claims that it is the owner and exclusive copyright holder of the photo - and that Lopez did not have permission to share the picture.
“Plaintiff never licensed the photograph to the defendant,” the court documents read. “Nevertheless, Lopez used it without authorisation or permission from plaintiff to do so.
“Specifically, Lopez or someone acting on her behalf copied the photograph and distributed it on Instagram, via the @jlo account, on a story posted 7 November 2017.”
The paparazzi agency also alleges that the 50-year-old was informed of her infringement in a letter dated December 2017, and that Lopez’s use of the photo negatively impacted the amount of money the company could have made.
“The photograph is creative, distinctive and valuable,” the company stated in court documents. “Because of the subject’s celebrity status, and the photograph’s quality and visual appeal, plaintiff (and the photographer it represents) stood to gain revenue from licensing the photograph. But defendant’s unauthorised use harms the existing and future market for the original photograph.
“The Instagram post made the photograph immediately available to Lopez’s tens of millions of followers… who would otherwise be interested in viewing licensed versions of the photograph in the magazines and newspapers that are plaintiff’s customers.”
In addition to the $150,000, the agency is also seeking an injunction against Lopez that would stop her and her team from posting the photo in the future, according to the court documents.
Earlier this year, paparazzi photo agency Xclusive-Lee attempted to sue Gigi Hadid for copyright infringement after the model shared one the company’s photos to her Instagram account.
At the time, Hadid shared a lengthy post to Instagram in which she said that she thought the lawsuit was “absurd”.
Explaining the emotional toll the paparazzi can have on those whose picture they are pursuing, Hadid said that she found the picture on Twitter and had “no way of knowing” which photographer took it.
“To the paparazzi, I understand that this is how you make your living, and I respect that this is something I must accept with my job. But there is a line,” Hadid wrote.
The case was eventually dismissed after a New York district judge found that the picture agency had not secured the official copyright registration for the photo by the time it filed the lawsuit, according to Business Insider.
Previously, Khloe Kardashian, 50 Cent, Jessica Simpson and Ariana Grande have also faced copyright infringement lawsuits after sharing paparazzi photographs of themselves to Instagram.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments