I'll name that tune in court

Mark Cook
Monday 04 May 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Mark Cook samples some more rifts over riffs in the music business

Sampling and plagiarism in music have long been bones of contention within the industry. Disgruntled music publishers call it stealing, whilst some artists call it part of the creative process. Established acts can afford to negotiate for the right to use snippets of others' work, but some try to get away with what they think is an undetectable steal - risking the consequences if caught.

Now a third category is being established - those who sample without asking and then shout loudly about it. This is the tactic employed by the alliance of US musicians and Internet-based pranksters that have come together to challenge what they regard as outdated laws concerning copyright in music. Illegal Art, Detritus and ark joined forces two months ago to release the CD Deconstructing Beck . It consists of 13 tracks of musical collage, created by various unknowns on low- to no-cost computer software, and almost all of the material used was sampled directly from Beck's output. Illegal Art provided the musicians, Detritus gave space on its web pages and trouble-making underground art foundation ark donated $5,000 to make it all possible.

Illegal Art made sure the release got the attention they felt it deserved by putting Beck's label, Geffen Records, at the top of the mailing list. Needless to say, the CD soon made its way to the desk of Geffen lawyer Brian McPherson. He fired a warning off to those involved, calling them "stupid" and telling them to expect the full weight of the law to fall upon them.

It was at this stage that experimental independent band Negativland stepped in. Negativland are no stranger to lawyers themselves, having been involved in a lengthy legal dispute with Island records over their 1991 recording U2, which featured samples from U2's "I Still Haven"t Found What I"m Looking For". The legal fight cost them $45,000 and their relationship with SST Records, who released the single. But it also inspired them to publish an impressively researched document of the affair and their views on copyright - cheekily titled "Fair Use: The Story of the Letter U and the Numeral 2".

Alarmed at what they saw as heavy-handed tactics by another large record label, Negativland sent an e-mail to McPherson. They wanted to make it clear they thought the release was covered by fair use and posed no threat to Beck's sales: "You and your client, Beck, have nothing to fear from this sort of work which is in no way co-optive or competitive with the original material! This is so patently obvious in the work itself, it is a little embarrassing to have to point it out to a lawyer."

The lawyer got a little hot under the collar at this criticism, but Geffen have decided not to pursue the case further. Beck's publisher BMG, however, has ordered Illegal Art to "cease and desist" - American legal speak for "stop selling this now or we'll see you in court". But pseudonymous Illegal Art spokesman Philo T Farnsworth is unruffled by this: "We received a `cease and desist' letter from BMG but we are currently ignoring it since it wasn't a court order and it wasn't even sent to me. They never were able to find out who I was so they addressed it to my alias and sent it to the Illegal Art e-mail address."

Negativland have now put the CD out on their own Seeland label, viewing it as an important work in the fight against the corporate stranglehold on creativity. They achieved something of a landmark themselves with their last release, an album entitled Dispepsi, which sampled huge swathes of Pepsi advertising jingles alongside critical material. After some consideration Pepsi decided not to take any action, leaving the band with the finances to release a new mini-album. This features the track "OJ and his personal trainer kill Ron and Nicole" - made from a collection of audio snippets of an OJ Simpson exercise video. They obviously enjoy a little controversy.

Fair and unfair use is also an issue in the UK. The recent example of The Verve"s "Bittersweet Symphony" shows that music publishers are ever vigilant. The Verve had to hand over 100 per cent of royalties for a sample of an orchestral version of the Rolling Stones track "The Last Time" even though it was described as "subliminal" by lead man Richard Ashcroft.

The KLF (many may have long forgotten that this stood for Kopyright Liberation Front) were caught red-handed right at the start of their career. Then known as the JAMMs, they incurred the wrath of Abba, who had them destroy all the copies of their first LP which borrowed heavily from "Dancing Queen". It has recently been made available again at the Detritus web site, along with Negativland"s "U2" single.

Six years before their hit single "Tubthumping", Chumba-wamba had to scrap the release of their own-label LP Jesus H Christ after the letters from publishers started to arrive. The record was like an A-Z of the bands influences - with stolen choruses from Abba to Zappa - via The Beatles, Kylie Minogue and T Rex.

That experience, Chumba- wamba's Boff explains, has coloured their attitude to intellectual property rights now that they have become commercially successful: "We were really careful when we signed a publishing contract to put in a clause which said if we didn't want the publishing company to pursue a case then they couldn't."

The idea that the buck should stop with the artist is heartily approved of by Negativland"s Mark Hosler, who only wishes that Beck would see it the same way: "Our point is basically: `Hey Beck, you make half your records out of samples and we know that you don't clear all of them - you clear the ones that are obviously recognisable.' There are way more sampled bits on his records than they are clearing - because a lot of it is too obscure.

"We're saying to him: `you're a Top-40 big-time rock star now. You come from the independent music world and it would help if you came out publicly and said: `Hey this Deconstructing Beck thing, it's just a collage. It's not ripping me off, it's not piracy - this is okay, this is exactly what I do.' So far he has said nothing and that is really unfortunate and to his detriment."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in