Vaginal orgasms are a 'myth', researchers claim
New study claims terms are wrong and need to be reconsidered
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
There is no such thing as a vaginal orgasm, a clitoral orgasm or even a G-spot, a new study claims.
Instead, a paper published in the journal Clinical Anatomy says, the correct term should be "female orgasm".
According to the report, the descriptions of female sexual organs are wrong. It claims the “internal clitoris does not exist” because the entire clitoris is, in fact, an external organ.
The study says that the majority of women do not orgasm during penetrative sex and the ‘vaginal’ orgasm reported by some women is in fact caused by the surrounding erectile organs – or stimulation of the clitoris.
Although it is impossible to have a clitoral orgasm, women cannot orgasm without stimulation of the clitoris.
Writing in the study, published earlier this week, the researchers say: “female orgasm is possible in all women, always with effective stimulation of the female erect organs”.
Previously, it was believed that G-spot, vaginal or clitoral orgasm were all different types of climax.
The study attacks much of what has previously been written about female erogenous zones, claiming: “G-spot/vaginal/clitoral orgasm, vaginally activated orgasm, and clitorally activated orgasm, are incorrect terms”.
Describing female ejaculation, premature ejaculation, and G-spot amplification, the study also claims these are “terms without scientific basis.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments