Veto of NHS report angers Information Commissioner Christopher Graham
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Blocking the publication of a document on the risks of NHS reforms is a sign that ministers want to downgrade Freedom of Information laws, a watchdog has warned.
The Information Commissioner, Christopher Graham, criticised the Government's decision to exercise its veto, in a report on the case to Parliament.
Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, vetoed an Information Tribunal ruling that he should meet Labour demands to publish the Transition Risk Register, which sets out internal government assessments of the dangers posed by the reforms in the Health and Social Care Act.
Mr Graham dismissed Mr Lansley's argument that there were exceptional circumstances and that it involved a matter of principle, saying that the decision "marks a significant step in the Government's approach to freedom of information".
The Department of Health stood by its assertion, saying the Freedom of Information Act "was drafted specifically to allow for the ministerial veto".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments