Top surgeon cleared of misconduct charges

Pat Hurst,Pa
Friday 19 November 2010 12:55 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A top surgeon and former chairman of the British Medical Association was today "totally vindicated" his lawyer said, after a litany of misconduct charges against him were rejected by medical watchdogs.

James Johnson, 64, a "seasoned surgeon and distinguished doctor", was accused of acting with arrogance and carrying out amputations when other operations should have been considered.

But most of the charges were rejected after a ten week hearing of a Fitness to Practise panel of the General Medical Council (GMC) sitting in Manchester.

It had been claimed Mr Johnson had spent too much of his time in his high-flying role as chairman of the BMA and too little time caring for his patients and keeping his surgical practice up to date at the two hospitals where he worked in Runcorn and Warrington.

The GMC did find Mr Johnson did sometimes not properly involve himself with post-operative care of his patients because he was away in London on BMA duties.

But the GMC panel cleared him of most of the charges, including all the more serious ones.

Dr Johnson was said to be "relieved" following the hearing, which will continue later today, in line with normal GMC procedures, to decide if any sanctions should be taken against him, although this now appears unlikely.

Martin Ford, representing Mr Johnson, said the hearing had "resulted in his total vindication".

He said despite "inappropriate and lurid" headlines, the panel had found no patient had suffered because of his care, he had not carried out any unnecessary amputations and any allegation of clinical incompetence was proved wrong.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in