Tap water 'beats a lot of bottles'

Maxine Frith
Tuesday 08 August 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A glass of tap water can taste as good as, and often better than, some of the most expensive bottled varieties, according to a consumer magazine test.

A glass of tap water can taste as good as, and often better than, some of the most expensive bottled varieties, according to a consumer magazine test.

A taste-test by researchers at Health Which? magazine rated a glassful from the Thames Water company better than some bottled versions.

A panel of experts tested 25 natural mineral waters, 13 spring waters, two types of bottled drinking water and a sample from Thames Water.

On a five-point scale, both filtered and unfiltered Thames Water was given a top score by the panel.

Asda's bottled spring water at 12p a litre also scored top marks, as did Tesco's Value variety and the still spring water from Marks & Spencer. But the scores varied, with M&S's sparkling spring water scoring poorly - tasters described it as "metallic and bitter".

And the most expensive variety of mineral water - S. Pellegrino sparkling - was rated among the worst waters. Despite costing £1.09 for one litre, the taste panel said it was "salty, bicarbonate and sweet".

The Thames tap water was described as "earthy and chalky" with "very low flavour and odour" - characteristics that gave it a high score.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in