Side-effects now threaten long-living cancer patients

Jeremy Laurance
Saturday 23 February 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Treatment for testicular cancer is now so successful that the cure has become a cause of disease. Men with the cancer are living so long that the damaging side-effects of the treatment are affecting their quality of life and could cut short their remaining years.

Treatment for testicular cancer is now so successful that the cure has become a cause of disease. Men with the cancer are living so long that the damaging side-effects of the treatment are affecting their quality of life and could cut short their remaining years.

Scientists warn today that with cure rates of 90 per cent in many cases and nearly 50 per cent even in those with the most aggressive or intractable cancers, over-treatment may put patients at unnecessary risk of a range of diseases and damage their long-term wellbeing.

The result is that they may be more at risk from the treatment itself than from the cancer returning.

In an editorial in the current issue of Annals of Oncology, Dr Karim Fizazi, of the Institute Gustave Roussy at Villejuif in France, said it was now vital to direct research towards moderating side-effects.

"Long-term side-effects of treatment need to be considered since patients who reach the stage of complete response are likely to live for decades. In a way, patients have become the victims of the success of treatment," he writes

He was commenting on findings from two studies published in the journal, which examined the long-term toxicity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy used to treat the disease. Researchers led by Dr Max Scheulen and Dr Dirk Strumberg of the West German Cancer Centre at the University of Essen, examined 32 patients aged from 30 to 59 who had been treated with chemotherapy between 13 and 17 years earlier.

Although all 32 reported that they felt healthy, the researchers found a wide range of potentially worrying long-term side-effects. Nearly a third had abnormal functioning of the heart and three quarters had elevated hormone levels indicative of low testosterone levels.

Over 80 per cent had raised cholesterol. Nearly a quarter had some deafness, while over a third had problems with nerve damage.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in