'Shambolic' hospital left patients waiting in pain for scans

Health Editor,Jeremy Laurance
Thursday 14 November 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A hospital was criticised yesterday for allowing its screening department to descend into a "chaotic shambles" that left thousands of patients in pain, waiting for tests that were never done.

The Chase Farm Hospital in Barnet, north London, "failed patients at every level" the Government's NHS watchdog, the Commission for Health Improvement (CHI), said.

A routine inspection of the hospital's radiology department revealed 2,700 requests for ultrasound scans that had been allowed to pile up and were never processed. Some patients had waited up to 19 months for tests on conditions ranging from suspected cancer to gallstones.

A clash of egos among consultants fuelled by disputes over private practice contributed to the chaos by generating an "atmosphere of unease and ill feeling" in the department. Allegations that private work was being done in NHS time are being investigated by the NHS Counter Fraud Service and a decision on a complaint of race discrim-ination is awaited.

An investigation into the hospital's failings, published yesterday, says that 80 per cent of the patients caught up in the backlog have now been screened and almost a quarter had an abnormal result.

Although no patient is known to have suffered harm because of the delays, the report says the condition of 543 patients who went elsewhere for their scans is not known.

A disturbing finding is that the requests for scans were allowed to pile up in the full knowledge of the staff that ran the department, even though a prompt response for a patient with cancer could improve their survival chances. The backlog was frequently discussed at meetings but nothing was done. It became so routine that scans were performed if GPs or patients complained, regardless of their clinical priority.

Peter Homa, chief executive of CHI, said the hospital had tolerated a "high risk" situation that had not been properly managed. "It is a matter of luck that no patient appears to have suffered a serious adverse outcome," he said.

"The clinical condition of all the patients affected must be reviewed to confirm whether anybody was harmed. The rest of the NHS should learn from this unacceptable incident."

There had been a similar backlog of 800 requests for ultrasound scans in 2000 and while that was being cleared the second backlog built up. In May 2002 there was still a backlog and no system in place to ensure it did not happen again, the report says.

The hospital issued a public apology for the delays and its chief executive, Liz Hayer, resigned after the problems were disclosed in February. CHI said yesterday that new management at the Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals Trust had taken "robust action" to deal with the failings and had cleared the backlog but still needed an action plan.

The trust had also failed to resolve difficulties over the merger of Chase Farm and Barnet hospitals four years earlier, the report said. Even now, the radiology service operated as two separate departments within the trust.

The report says the trust must put patients first when planning and providing care and systems must be put in place so the trust knows if a patient has had an ultrasound.

It adds that a doctor with senior management experience must be appointed to lead the department and get the team working together.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in