Security checks for care staff on hold

Charles Begley
Sunday 08 September 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government has postponed "indefinitely" its deadline for vetting care-home staff who look after the elderly and the vulnerable. The move has provoked an angry response from campaigners, including Help the Aged and the National Pensioners Convention, who say they fear for the safety of patients.

The Department of Health has postponed its original deadline of 1 August because the Criminal Records Bureau was taking too long to process applications. The CRB has already come under fire for failing to process applications from thousands of teachers in time for the start of the autumn term.

This week a team of troubleshooters was brought in by the Home Office, which set up the CRB, to oversee the operation to clear the backlog of applications.

Government officials have said only a handful of applicants have been turned down for jobs on the basis of their criminal histories.

Rodney Bickerstaffe, president of the National Pensioners Convention, said the use of the private-finance initiative to conduct criminal-record checks had proved a failure.

"They have failed to deliver on the demands put before them," he said. "This is simply not good enough, and older people deserve the guarantees and checks for their own health and safe well-being."

Help the Aged also criticised the failings of the CRB, but insisted such checks should not be relied upon. A spokesman said employers also needed to be vigilant in monitoring staff who may not have a criminal record but could be abusers.

"We are going to go through the same thing that teachers have been going through," he said.

"But we shouldn't see criminal record checks as the be-all and end-all, and I would hope that proper checks are made with references and suitability of individuals to perform the job."

Care-home employers have been advised that staff without CRB clearance should not have unsupervised access to vulnerable people.

The Department of Health said it was monitoring the situation to ensure the safety of the 504,000 people in care homes, and was working with the CRB to complete the checks "as quickly as possible".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in