Scrapping of flu campaign 'was a factor in deaths'

Katie Hodge
Tuesday 17 April 2012 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government's decision to scrap the flu awareness campaign may have contributed to a host of preventable deaths, the former chief medical officer has said.

A report by Professor Sir Liam Donaldson concluded there were more fatalities and admissions to hospital in England in the winter of 2010/11 than during the flu pandemic the previous year.

This was "likely" to have been caused by "striking" differences in the Government response and a "laissez-faire" approach adopted during the second outbreak, he concluded.

The paper, published in Eurosurveillance, found there were about 10 per cent more hospital admissions, 30 per cent more deaths and 30 per cent more critical care admissions in the second year than in the pandemic year, when there were two waves of illness. Professor Lindsey Davies, president of the Faculty of Public Health, told GP magazine: "It is a source of great concern that lives may have been lost because people were not reminded of the risks of flu and how to avoid getting it."

But Professor David Salisbury, director of immunisation at the Department of Health, said the Government disagreed with some of the report's conclusions.

"The authors have compared periods of high levels of flu that happened in completely different circumstances," he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in