Public to have say on rationing of NHS care

Lorna Duckworth Health Correspondent
Tuesday 20 August 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A panel of lay advisers is to help experts to make controversial decisions about health care, such as whether young patients should have greater access to drugs and therapies than older people.

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (Nice), which decides what treatments should be available on the NHS, is to recruit a Citizens' Council of 30 people.

The council will not take part in the clinical assessment of new medicines, which will continue to be made by specialist committees.

But it will consider "broader principles", such as whether cancer patients should be given expensive drugs to prolong their lives for a few weeks. It could also discuss whether treatments should be subject to age-related rationing.

For example, it could influence guidance on treating schizophrenia or multiple sclerosis if it felt younger people with jobs would gain more benefit from costly drugs.

It could also have a say over whether treatments for obesity or to help people stop smoking should be provided only if patients showed a genuine commitment to improving their health.

Nice said yesterday that the Citizens' Council was intended to provide "a backdrop of public opinion against which independent committees can make their decisions".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in