Poor areas to get NHS spending boost

Jo Dillon,Deputy Political Editor
Sunday 06 October 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A review of National Health Service funding is expected to channel cash into underprivileged areas of the UK in a departure from the existing targets-based formula.

Ministers had made it clear that from next year funding would be allocated according to hospitals' performance in relation to key targets.

But money is now to be diverted to poorer areas where people are getting a worse hospital service than in wealthier neighbouring areas.

The NHS is to get a £40bn injection, funded by a 1 per cent rise in National Insurance contributions from next April, but ministers are concerned that the money is not going to reach the inner cities and other struggling districts.

At a meeting at the Labour Party conference, Lord Hunt, a Health minister, said: "One of the problems with the health service is that the poorest areas are often provided with the poorest services, and we have got to try and change that round.

"We do want to shift the resources to the places where they are most needed."

That would mean that "failing" hospitals, two out of three of which did not record improvements last year despite a £5bn boost, could get more funds to help to drag them up the league tables.

Lord Hunt also signalled the Government's intention to move away from a reliance on targets. He said the biggest complaint from public sector staff was pressure caused by performance targets, and the Government's aim was to keep targets to a minimum.

The funding review is certain to cause political controversy when it concludes at the end of the year, especially if the bulk of NHS funding rises appear to be earmarked for Labour's heartland areas.

And that would come in the wake of the current dispute in the Cabinet over other health service reforms. Alan Milburn, the Secretary of State for Health, is keen to leave open the possibility of "foundation" hospitals – successful hospitals allowed to borrow extra cash – being exempt from state control. But Gordon Brown, the Chancellor, insists that borrowing will have to stay within the constraints set for the public sector.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in