Parents of stillborn upset over foetus store

Ian Herbert,Northern Correspondent
Tuesday 14 November 2000 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Alder Hey children's hospital in Liverpool was swamped with calls from parents of stillborn babies yesterday because of reports that up to 400 foetuses had been kept without permission.

The Alder Hey children's hospital in Liverpool was swamped with calls from parents of stillborn babies yesterday because of reports that up to 400 foetuses had been kept without permission.

The hospital is already at the centre of an external investigation, ordered by the Health Secretary, Alan Milburn, into revelations that organs from up to 850 infants were taken without parental consent and stockpiled.

Although Alder Hay has been contrite since the organ scandal surfaced 11 months ago, it responded angrily to renewed controversy over the foetuses, collected from other hospitals across the North-west between 1988 and 1995.

The hospital said the number of foetuses had been publicly detailed in reports to its own board and an internal serious incident team on which relatives sit, but had not elicited publicity amid the sheer scale of the organ scandal.

The NHS North West Executive said the new controversy was "not in the interest of bereaved families", who would incur unnecessary anxieties. The existence of the foetuses had been known for 10 months, it added.

Kate Jackson, project director of Alder Hey's serious incident team, said parents who approached the hospital had been provided with "the fullest information" about organs and foetuses held. "Many families will have moved on, many families will not want to be reminded, many individual mothers will not want to be reminded," she said.

But Ed Bradley, spokesman for Alder Hey parents' group Pity2, said he was "horrified" at the collection of foetuses, mostly after stillbirths and terminations, for Professor Dick Van Velzen, the pathologist at the centre of the organ scandal.

"Alder Hey knew about this and should have made this known months ago," said Mr Bradley. "Some of these foetuses... were wanted and parents would have had no idea they would end up in a hospital store."

Ian Cohen, a solicitor who represents many of the families, said: "We have been making discreet inquiries during the past four weeks. It now transpires there is in fact a [foetal] collection. I see no difference between the retention of organs and whole foetuses."

About 300 foetuses were received between 1988 and 1995 from the former Mill Road and Oxford Street maternity hospitals in Liverpool.

The number retained for research by Alder Hey was far greater than the national norm, though investigators have been unable to state precisely how many were used for research. Government guidelines since 1989 state mothers must give written consent for any research work on foetuses. The storage of foetuses dates to the tenure of Professor Velzen, who worked at the hospital between 1988 and 1995.

Foetus retention is believed to have been examined in an independent investigation, ordered by Mr Milburn, which was completed seven days ago and whose report may be published next month.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in