NHS hospital bought 177 different types of glove

Health Editor,Jeremy Laurance
Wednesday 02 February 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A hospital that bought 177 different types of surgical glove was cited yesterday as an example of the gross inefficiency in NHS purchasing practice.

Other trusts wasted money buying 21 different types of A4 paper and an eyewatering 1,751 different cannulas – the plastic tubes used to drip blood or other fluids into veins.

In a highly critical report, the National Audit Office (NAO) said NHS trusts were paying millions of pounds more than necessary for supplies by making small purchases, buying many different types of the same product, and paying widely differing prices. At least £500m a year could be saved if they were more efficient, the NAO said.

The report comes as the NHS faces demands for savings of up to £20bn over the next four years, to help pay for the needs of an ageing population and new treatment techniques while its budget remains flat or declines.

Margaret Hodge, the chair of the Committee for Public Accounts, said improving purchasing of supplies was one "very obvious area" where savings could be made.

"It is simply unacceptable that so many hospital trusts are currently paying more than they need for basic supplies," she said. "Even for some of the commonest items, the price hospitals pay varies by more than 100 per cent."

But Sue Slipman, director of the Foundation Trust Network, said: "Centralised purchasing schemes have not always proved effective or efficient."

She said foundation trusts managing their own budgets in difficult economic times already had all the incentives they needed to save money.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in