New rules on baby care after deaths inquiry

Michael Durham,Health Correspondent
Saturday 23 June 2001 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Doctors have been told to stop using an intravenous feeding technique on sick premature babies after an inquiry into the deaths of four children at hospitals in Greater Manchester.

The babies – between two days and one week old – died in intensive care units of a rare complication, after tiny plastic feeding tubes were inserted into their hearts. The technique has been used on up to 1,600 newborn infants annually.

Yesterday, the chief medical officer, Professor Liam Donaldson, issued guidelines modifying the way that severely sick babies are intravenously fed. Doctors will in future be expected to adopt an alternative, but still risky, method of inserting the tube into a large vein near the heart. The medical profession was divided over the advisability of inserting tubes into the heart itself, and Professor Donaldson said no blame should be attached to doctors who had carried out the procedures.

Adopting a "shame and blame" culture in the NHS would not help to improve NHS services, and he hoped the error would be a "source of learning, not judgement", he said.

The intravenous feeding technique is used only on gravely ill babies born with complications that prevent them feeding normally. A tiny plastic catheter is inserted into a vein in the neck, or elsewhere in the baby's body, and pushed towards the heart so liquid nutrients can be added to the bloodstream.

Doctors have been divided over whether it was safer to place the tip of the catheter inside one of the chambers of the heart, or just outside in the vena cava, a large vein. The nutrients must be released in or close to the heart, where there is a good blood supply to disperse it around the body.

In the four cases, the position of the catheter head in the heart caused irritation and a leakage of fluid, which in turn put pressure on the heart, causing it to fail.

Dr David Hallworth, a consultant anaesthetist at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children in Glasgow, helped to carry out the review and said that both procedures were risky.

Some doctors held that when children were gravely ill the risk of inserting directly into the heart was justified, because the nutrient would be properly diluted in the bloodstream. "All these babies required this. An insertion of the line was fully justified," he said.

Cardiac tamponade, the complication that caused the deaths, was extremely rare. None of the doctors had seen it before, and Dr Hallworth estimated that a doctor would only experience a case once in 20 years.

Dr Unni Wariyar, a consultant paediatrician at the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, said the hearts of newborn babies were only the size of a walnut, and it was extremely difficult to position the tip of the tube in exactly the right place. It was possible for the tube to move and puncture the heart.

The four cases were all uncovered in Manchester after an inquest last year on four-day-old Connor Highton, from Shaw, near Oldham. The baby suffered from low blood sugar, and a catheter was inserted to feed him, but he died in Royal Oldham Hospital.

Recording a verdict of death by misadventure, the coroner, Barrie Williams, called for extra safeguards on intravenous feeding. Three other cases came to light in the same area which had occurred over the previous two years. Six-day-old James Ashworth had died at St Marys Hospital, Manchester, the same month. Ten-day-old Daniel Carpenter, who weighed only a little over 2lb, died at Stepping Hill Hospital in Stockport after a catheter was inserted in his heart. Another baby, named Katie, died after seven days of cardiac tamponade, also at St Marys Hospital.

Professor Donaldson said research was continuing to establish whether similar deaths had occurred elsewhere in the country. He added that many of the gravely ill babies in intensive care would not survive without intravenous feeding.

"The field of care reviewed in this report is at the leading edge of complex high technology medicine. Many of the 12,000 sick babies treated in intensive care each year are quite literally clinging to life. This presents new evidence we have not seen before and points the way to making a rare complication even rarer," he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in