New research proves risk of death cut by screening
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An attempt to settle the controversy over breast screening has been made by researchers who reported the results of a 15-year study yesterday which showed that screening cut the risk of death from the disease by 21 per cent.
Internal links
An attempt to settle the controversy over breast screening has been made by researchers who reported the results of a 15-year study yesterday which showed that screening cut the risk of death from the disease by 21 per cent.
Doctors in Sweden, who analysed the results of four trials involving 247,000 women, said the findings, published in The Lancet, should help to end doubts about whether screening was worthwhile.
However, in the light of the row over the delay in winning NHS approval for the breast-cancer drug Herceptin, some specialists have questioned whether the £37m annual cost of screening in the UK would save more lives if it were spent on improving breast cancer treatment.
The controversy began two years ago after two Danish researchers analysed seven trials of breast screening which suggested no benefit from the procedure. A follow-up article published in The Lancet last October confirmed their earlier conclusion.
The finding started a furore in the US where the Physicians Data Query Board, a body of experts which advises the National Cancer Institute, said in January that "mammography may not be beneficial". This prompted an angry response from the American Medical Association and the American Cancer Society which were among 10 signatories to a full-page advertisement in The New York Times extolling the benefits of screening.
In the latest study, Lennarth Nystrom and colleagues from Umea University found a benefit in screening women over 55 years old although not younger women. They rejected the two Danish studies as "misleading and scientifically unfounded." In a commentary on the finding, Karen Gelmon and Ivo Olivotto from the British Columbia Cancer Agency said it confirms that "screening mammography has a real but modest effect in decreasing mortality from breast cancer".
However, they add: "Since breast cancer accounts for only about 4 per cent of all deaths annually, even a 21 per cent reduction in breast cancer mortality is barely measurable."
The benefits of breast screening are likely to be backed by the World Health Organisation which is to release the findings of its own investigation on the issue on Monday.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments