Hundreds of NHS patients are being denied chance of IVF

Licence fees collected by fertility regulator from clinics could fund 1,000 free treatment cycles

Jeremy Laurance
Thursday 16 February 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Britain's fertility regulator has run up a surplus of more than £3m from charges imposed on the clinics it licenses, enough to provide 1,000 free cycles of IVF treatment on the NHS.

The unspent funds raised by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) mean hundreds of NHS patients cannot get the treatment they need to help them have a baby.

The authority charges a £75 fee on every IVF treatment, which is paid either by the patient, if they are treated privately, or by the clinic if they are being treated on the NHS. If the charges had been waived for NHS clinics, more patients could have been treated.

The HFEA licenses 132 clinics, which pay an average of £36,000 a year each in charges. These have contributed to a surplus of £3.4m, which is more than half the organisations' annual budget of £6.2m.

The HFEA said it had built up the surplus as a result of "prudent" budgeting. It said it had expected the number of treatment cycles to fall because of the recession and the squeeze on the NHS budget; this would have led to a reduction in the authority's income. Instead, demand for treatment has unexpectedly continued to increase.

In total, three-quarters of the HFEA's budget comes from fees; the rest is provided by a grant from the Department of Health. In October, the HFEA cut its fees by 28 per cent and it now says its surplus will not continue to grow.

Some fertility specialists think it has not gone far enough. Allan Pacey, chair of the British Fertility Society, called for the authority to return three-quarters of the surplus to the clinics.

"The NHS claims that it can't fund IVF a lot of the time and therefore patients are having to pay privately. That money could help hundreds of people have treatment. It sounds like it's time to give a bit back – it should definitely not go back to the Department of Health," Dr Pacey told the Health Service Journal.

Under guidance issued by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in 2004, NHS primary care trusts are expected to provide three cycles of IVF to infertile women aged from 23 to 40 who meet certain criteria.

In practice, most trusts restrict the number of free cycles they provide to one or two and many impose further curbs which have tightened following the squeeze on the NHS budget.

The All Party Parliamentary Committee on Infertility criticised the "arbitrary restrictions" on the provision of IVF last year.

A spokeswoman for the HFEA said it had been agreed with the Department of Health that money would not be returned to the clinics because, in the case of private patients, there was no way of ensuring that it would be forwarded to those who had paid it.

Instead the HFEA had planned to use the surplus to "create benefit for patients", but this idea had been rejected by the Government, she said.

A Department of Health spokeswoman said: "Through the annual business planning process we are having ongoing discussions with the HFEA to ensure that its future spending and revenue deliver the most efficient and effective service for patients and those who are regulated."

Clare Lewis-Jones, chief executive of Infertility Network, said: "We strongly believe that the funds built up by the HFEA should be reinvested back into the area which they regulate and that infertility patients should benefit."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in