Hospital apologises for doctor's epilepsy errors

Anna Whitney
Friday 30 November 2001 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A hospital trust apologised to the parents of 133 children yesterday after it admitted that they had been wrongly diagnosed and treated with powerful drugs for epilepsy by a consultant paediatrician.

An investigation is being carried out into the case notes of 8,500 patients cared for by Dr Andrew Holton at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, which said it fully accepted the report on the cases reviewed so far.

The review, by the Royal College of Paediatricians, is assessing whether Dr Holton wrongly diagnosed children as having epilepsy, and gave them powerful drugs that they did not need. Parents said the unnecessary medication had made the children become like "zombies", and accused the NHS of failing hundreds of families.

Dr Holton was also said to have over-subscribed drugs to patients who genuinely suffered from epilepsy. His mistakes were blamed on lack of training and support, and poor access to equipment.

Dr Holton was suspended on full pay in June. A copy of the report has been sent to the General Medical Council, which will determine whether he can continue to practice.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in