Gynaecologist guilty of carrying out unnecessary hysterectomies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A gynaecologist has been found guilty of carrying out unnecessary hysterectomies without his patients' consent.
Michael Pembrey, 56, was accused of carrying out the unwanted treatments during 10 years, while a hospital doctor. He also sterilised two women, one with severe learning difficulties and another aged 25 with Down's syndrome, without proper consent or authority, the General Medical Council found. The GMC will rule today whether Dr Pembrey, from Battle in East Sussex, is guilty of serious professional misconduct, a charge he denies.
The allegations involved nine women he treated between November 1989 and September 1999, while a consultant at the Conquest Hospital in Hastings, East Sussex.
In relation to one of the women, he was found not guilty of serious professional misconduct after burning her thigh during a hysteroscopy in September 1995 – a procedure used to view the uterine cavity. He was also cleared of performing a clinically unjustified examination of a woman's cervix in November 1998.
However, the GMC in London ruled yesterday that he carried out an unnecessary hysterectomy on a 27-year-old woman – referred to as Patient A – and failed to act in her best interests.
The woman told the GMC that the doctor had destroyed her dream of having children with her new husband following the operation in 1990.
Another woman, known as Patient B, had her womb removed unnecessarily after being treated by Dr Pembrey for urinary symptoms.
The mother-of-three, who was 45 at the time, had claimed that Dr Pembrey said her uterus was just "a bloody nuisance" that was "flapping around". But the GMC found that these comments had not been proven.
In September 1999, Dr Pembrey removed the cervix, ovaries and fallopian tubes of a woman – known as Patient I – without her consent after she was referred to him suffering from heavy periods.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments