Guidelines issued on fighting smallpox

Jeremy Laurance
Thursday 18 October 2001 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Planning for a bioterrorist attack in Britain moved up a gear yesterday as the government issued fresh guidelines to health authorities on how to deal with botulism, bubonic plague and smallpox.

The advice was sent out by the Public Health Laboratory Service, but the government's chief medical officer, Professor Liam Donaldson, insisted there was "no specific threat" to Britain, and urged people not to panic. He said "governments usually concentrated on" the three agents, plus anthrax, when facing a terrorist threat, although there was no current suggestion they might be used.

As false alarms again disrupted services across Britain, Professor Donaldson condemned hoaxers who spread panic and put extra pressure on emergency services. He asked the media not to exacerbate fears. "It isn't right that people should be alarmed and there is no need for it," he said.

The Government faced a dilemma because it had to plan for any possible attack but, in making the plans public, it increased fear among the population. Professor Donaldson said: "If it is bioterrorism that is behind these [US anthrax attacks], it is the fear they are producing that is bringing the success they are achieving.''

Smallpox would potentially pose a bigger threat, because it is contagious and can spread through the population. However, only two samples of the virus are held, in laboratories in the US and Russia, and terrorists are not thought to have access to either.

Botulism is a food poisoning bacterium and one of the most lethal toxins known, but it would be even more difficult to distribute than anthrax. Bubonic plague, a form of which was responsible for the Black Death pandemic in Europe and Asia in the 14th century, responds to treatment with antibiotics.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in