GSK to publish clinical trial data for drugs
Pharmaceutical giant shocks medical world by opting to reveal findings of all tests on patients
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain’s largest pharmaceutical company has stunned the medical world by announcing it would back a campaign to publish all clinical trial results to preserve the safety of medicines.
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) announced the move eight months after it was hit with a record $3bn (£1.9bn) fine in the US last July, in part for withholding safety data about its best selling diabetes drug, Avandia.
In all, 26 drug companies – including eight of the 10 biggest global players – have racked up fines of more than $11bn (£7bn) in the last three years after having been found to have acted dishonestly.
The results of clinical trials, most of which are funded by the drug industry, are frequently withheld when they deliver disappointing results. This distorts the evidence base and raises doubts about the safety of medicines that are available on the market.
GSK said in a statement it would sign up to the alltrials.net campaign which is seeking the registration of all clinical trials, the reporting of all summary results and for full Clinical Study Results – the detailed findings – to be made public.
Campaign organisers who include Ben Goldacre, best-selling author of Bad Pharma, Fiona Godlee, editor of the British Medical Journal and Sir Iain Chalmers, co-founder of the Cochrane Library, said it was a “cartwheel moment.” Dr Goldacre said he had met Andrew Whitty, chief executive of GSK, last week.
“It was clear they have spent a lot of time thinking about these issues. While I will always wait for proof of the pudding I do not believe this is mere lip service,” Dr Goldacre said.
“There is no serious defence for withholding information about clinical trials from doctors and patients. It is simply unethical and it harms patients.”
Observers said GSK had occupied the moral high ground by its move and rival firms would likely follow suit.
The alltrials.net campaign has grown rapidly since publication of Bad Pharma four months ago, winning the backing of the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust. The Commons Science and Technology Committee has announced an inquiry into missing trials.
The latest target of the campaigners is the Swiss multinational Roche, which has been accused by the British Medical Journal of sitting on trial data for its flu treatment, Tamiflu, which governments around the world have stockpiled against a possible pandemic at a cost of billions of pounds.
GSK also said it intends to publish details of trials for all approved medicines dating back to its formation in 2000.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments