Drug firms accused of 'inventing' disease

Jeremy Laurance
Friday 03 January 2003 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Drug companies will be accused today of sponsoringthe creation of a new disease ­ female sexual dysfunction ­ to profit from the supply of drugs to treat it.

A series of international meetings, supported by the pharmaceutical industry, held over the past five years has promoted the disorder as a mechanical dysfunction similar to erectile problems in men, despite criticism that this ignores social and personal issues and is unhelpful to women.

A study in Journal of the American Medical Association (Jama) published in 1999 suggested that 43 per cent of women over the age of 18 had female sexual dysfunction.

The finding was based on a survey of 1,500 women who were asked if they had experienced any of seven symptoms in the previous year, including lack of desire or anxiety about performance.

Although the high number reporting problems was described by leading specialists as misleading and potentially dangerous, the figure has been widely quoted since. The Jama researchers were careful to point out that its finding was "not equivalent to clinical diagnosis", but this caveat is now regularly overlooked.

An investigation by the British Medical Journal, published today, says that researchers with close ties to drug companies have defined and classified the new disorder at company-sponsored meetings. The most recent conference, held in New York, was sponsored by Pfizer, which makes Viagra, the male anti-impotence drug that had sales of $1.5bn (£1bn) in 2001.

Other companies, including Bayer and Lilly, are due to launch rivals to Viagra this year and are planning to build markets relying heavily on the figure of 43 per cent.

The BMJ concludes there could be benefits to women from increased attention to female sexual problems, but adds: "The potential risk, in a process so heavily sponsored by drug companies, is that the complex social, personal and physical causes of sexual difficulties will be swept away in the rush to diagnose, label and prescribe."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in