Doubling of baby survival rates stirs abortion debate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The dispute over the 24-week abortion limit has been fuelled by the publication of figures from a leading premature-baby unit showing a dramatic increase in survival of babies born at 25 weeks or under.
From 1981 to 2000, the proportion of babies who survived after being born at 22-25 weeks gestation more than doubled from 32 per cent to 71 per cent at the University College London Hospitals NHS Trust.
Pressure has been growing for a cut in the 24-week limit because of evidence that some babies are viable at gestations of 23 or 22 weeks. MPs have been promised a free vote on any amendments on abortion to the Human Fertilisation and Embryo Bill currently before Parliament.
Professor John Wyatt, a consultant neo-natologist at UCLH, who led the study, published in Acta Paediatrica, said the survival rate for the unit was substantially higher than reported nationally. "We fully acknowledge that single-centre studies such as this one have statistical limitations because of the relatively small numbers involved. However, they are hugely important because they provide information on the survival rates that can be achieved with consistent levels of staffing and resources and with consistent policies."
Professor Wyatt was criticised by the Commons Science and Technology Committee last year for giving evidence that 42 per cent of babies born in his unit at 23 weeks showed signs of life. He later admitted that the figure had not been published in a peer- reviewed journal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments