Doctors still failing to tell women about alternatives to the Pill
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Women are being denied more effective and longer-lasting forms of contraception, despite an official ruling that they should have wider access to the services.
Thousands of unwanted pregnancies could be avoided each year if doctors offered patients contraceptive implants and injections rather than the Pill.
But doctors are still failing to tell women about alternatives to the Pill, research by the FPA (formerly known as the Family Planning Association) has found. The survey, to launch contraceptive awareness week, found that one in four women aged 16 to 49 take the Pill, compared with just 9 per cent who use long-acting reversible contraception (Larc) methods.
The four main Larc options are the intra-uterine device (IUD), the intra-uterine system (IUS), contraceptive implants or injections. The IUS and IUD methods involve the one-off insertion of a device that lasts for several years, while an injection will be effective for several weeks and an implant for years at a time.
The National Institute for Clinical and Healthcare Excellence (Nice), the body that rules on which drugs should be available on the NHS, said last year that more women should be offered Larc methods as a first choice rather than the Pill.
Nice estimated that if Larc uptake was increased by just 9 per cent, unplanned pregnancies could be cut by 70,000 a year and the NHS would save an annual £33m in maternity and abortion costs.
The FPA found that 76 per cent of callers to its helpline had never heard of the IUS, more than a third were unaware of the IUD, one in four had no knowledge of implants and 12 per cent did not know anything about injectable forms of contraception. Less than a third said their doctor or practice nurse had talked to them about alternatives to the Pill.
The majority of women who request an abortion or go through with an unplanned pregnancy say they were using contraception, but that it failed. Research has found that 47 per cent of women forget to take the Pill at least once a month and 22 per cent have missed a dose at least twice.
But a survey of GP surgeries by the FPA found that more than two months after the Nice guidance was issued, less than half of doctors had read the new recommendations.
Toni Belfield of the FPA said: "Women aren't asking about Larc methods and doctors and nurses aren't telling them. Primary care trusts are reluctant to put the funding in for Larc because of the upfront costs ... but that is taking a short-term view because in the long term they could save a lot of money.''
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments