Doctors in new drive to combat fraudulent research
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A national panel to combat scientific fraud was proposed by leading doctors yesterday after detected cases soared to 100 in the past four years. Unethical treatment, failure to obtain consent and fabricated results emerge regularly in scientific research but there is no formal system for detecting or dealing with them, doctors said.
Members of the Committee for Publication Ethics, set up by the editors of leading medical journals, stepped up their campaign yesterday for a national body with powers to tackle fraud. The United States andScandinavia have had such agencies for a decade
Last July, Dr Paul Chima, a GP in West Lothian, was struck off the medical register July for trying to get cash from a pharmaceutical company for a phoney drug trial. The GMC heard he had offered one patient a bribe of £2,000 not to report him to the authorities.
Again last year, Anjan Kumar Banerjee was found guilty by the General Medical Council of falsifying his research into Crohn's disease at King's College Hospital in 1990. He had fabricated test results for 12 "subjects" by substituting his urine for theirs.
At least six cases involving research fraud await hearings before the GMC but doctors fear many more go undetected because of the absence of a verifying system, or even expectation of investigation.
Professor Sir George Alberti, president of the Royal College of Physicians, said: "The situation is shambolic. There is a tendency to hush things up ... and there is a major deficit in training in good practice. We need a panel that must be independent and have real stature. This is absolutely critical."
The powers of the panel have not been worked out.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments