Doctor appraisals too weak, say MPs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans for doctors to face annual appraisals to ensure they are fit to practise contain weaknesses, a group of MPs has said.
At present, doctors can go for their entire career without facing any formal assessment of their competency. But the General Medical Council hopes to change this by introducing yearly appraisals and more comprehensive meetings every five years.
Doctors will also be expected to demonstrate they meet clinical standards and have kept up to speed with the latest developments in their field, while appraisals will include feedback from patients and colleagues.
However, the Commons Health Committee said yesterday that detecting inadequate doctors was viewed as "almost an insignificant part" of the appraisal process, which could take the form of a "cosy chat".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments