Dilnot calls for rapid action on costs cap for elderly care
As Government backs proposals, report's author says lives are still being 'blighted'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The architect of plans to overhaul the funding of long-term care for the elderly welcomed the Government's belated support last night – but urged rapid action to prevent thousands more lives being "blighted".
The Independent disclosed yesterday that David Cameron had swung behind Andrew Dilnot's proposal for a £35,000 lifetime cap on social care costs, to prevent families having to sell homes to pay their bills.
His government-commissioned report also recommended more than quadrupling to £100,000 the amount of savings people in residential homes were allowed to have before they had to pay for their care.
Ministers initially appeared to shelve his recommendations, but Mr Cameron has given them the go-ahead despite an estimated annual cost of £1.7bn.
One Whitehall source suggested Mr Cameron did not want to be outflanked by the Liberal Democrats and Labour, who were preparing to include the proposals in their next election manifestos.
Mr Dilnot expressed his delight at the Government's move, but warned that there was no time to lose in reforming the "broken" system of funding care for the elderly.
"I am very pleased – the reason I wanted to do this in the first place was it was both urgent and possible to make a difference," he told The Independent.
Michelle Mitchell, the charity director general of Age UK, agreed that the current system was "not fit for purpose".
She said: "At the moment individuals face catastrophic risk. They can work hard all their lives and if they need care – and that's often care with eating, with feeding, with supporting the care home – they can see all that they have worked for wiped away. It's not fair people aren't able to plan and protect themselves against this risk in later life."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments