NHS charges 'should target the rich and elderly', says King's Fund think-tank
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.New charges should be introduced for richer patients and pensioners and for visiting the GP, a major new study concludes today.
A Commission set up by the respected think-tank the King’s Fund says it could be necessary to raise money from wealthier patients to meet the long-term care needs of those who cannot afford to pay.
It also suggests the exemption from prescription charges for those aged over 60 could be removed or increased to 65, saying not all pensioners are poor.
Extending charges for dentistry could also increase revenue, while a fee for visiting the GP – of between £5 and £25 – could also be introduced.
The report also floats the idea of charging outpatients £10 for hospital appointments, while those who fail to turn up could also be charged as a penalty. Costs for hospital stays or hospital treatment might also have to be considered. It argues the changes are required to end the “lottery” of care that exists with local council cutting back on social care while NHS budgets are ring-fenced.
Another recommendation is for health and social care services in England to be merged with a single ring-fenced budget, as the report argues the separation between the NHS and social care is no longer “fit for purpose”.
“The contrast between a health service free at the point of use and a social care service that is means tested – and publicly funded only for those with heavy needs – results in a lottery, the type of ailment you have will determine the financial support you get to cope with its effects,” it says. “The outcome is that there is no equity.”
The Commission on the Future of Health and Social Care in England was established by the King’s Fund to provide fresh ideas for a problem.
The commission’s chairwoman, Kate Barker, said the situation was unsustainable.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments