Cancer research needs extra £100m, say MPs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Commons committee criticised the Government's attitude towards cancer research yesterday, complaining that it had "abdicated its responsibility" for the area.
A Commons committee criticised the Government's attitude towards cancer research yesterday, complaining that it had "abdicated its responsibility" for the area.
The Science and Technology Select Committee called for an extra £100m a year to be invested in cancer research as part of a shake-up of the way the disease was treated. Michael Clark, the committee chairman and Conservative MP for Rayleigh, said: "Cancer has been a scourge of the human race since the earliest times and still represents one of the world's most common diseases.
"It kills one in four people in the UK. One in three will be diagnosed with cancer at some stage in their lives. A world- class research programme is essential if we are to reduce the burden of this disease."
Making a series of recommendations for winning the battle against cancer, the committee urged ministers to create a National Cancer Institute and to focus on treatment times, not times to see a specialist.
The committee also demanded that "challenging targets" be set to reduce the time between GP referrals and the start of treatment.
Similarly, there should be an increase of the number of specialist cancer surgeons and registering cancer should be made a legal requirement.
The report, "Cancer Research - A Fresh Look", said much research was done to the "highest standards". But, "the furtherance of this research, and its exploitation to the benefit of patients, is compromised by chronic under-funding."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments