Beware the loofah, beware the tea cosy. Most of all, watch out for perilous socks

Charles Arthur,Technology Editor
Thursday 07 June 2001 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Caution: socks can damage your health. As can tights. And trousers, and beanbags, leaves, tea cosies, place mats, bread bins, clogs and false teeth. Not to mention vegetables.

This is the warning from the Government in its latest compilation of domestic accidents reported by hospitals, which finds that home is where the hurt is.

The data in the Home and Leisure Accident Surveillance System report shows that in 1999 there were 10,773 cases of people treated in hospital for accidents "caused by" socks and tights, 5,945 caused by trousers, 1,317 by beanbags, 1,171 by leaves, 787 by sponges and loofahs, and 37 by tea cosies. The numbers were similarly worrying for many other household objects ­ 933 people had to attend accident and emergency departments after unscheduled and injurious encounters with false teeth.

New Scientist magazine says today: "It is our favourite government report. It makes it clearer than ever that our homes are full of unacknowledged dangers."

But the Department of Trade and Industry, which collates the information, was reticent about the precise nature of the injuries."The report doesn't go into detail," a spokeswoman said. "That's not the purpose.The statistics are pulled together to help inform our consumer safety policy."

The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, which helped the DTI, professed itself mystified about the dangers of these apparently harmless objects. A spokeswoman made an (unrepeatable) suggestion as to how vegetable accidents occurred, and said people often slipped on household objects.

"Someone might go to casualty and be asked about how something happened, say where they cut themselves, and they would say 'It was the mushrooms', and that would get written down," she said. But she admitted. "We've drawn a blank on how you could injure yourself with false teeth."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in