Better care for elderly 'could save 60,000 lives'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Elderly people are dying of neglect and spending their final years in pain and discomfort because basic care is not being provided, a study has found.
There are at least 60,000 avoidable deaths in England every year and the study by doctors at the University of East Anglia suggests this figure could be substantially reduced with better care.
Nicholas Steel, a lecturer in primary care who led the study, said 65 per cent of patients in the study who were diagnosed with coronary heart disease were receiving the recommended drug treatment with beta blockers. If this were increased to 90 per cent, estimates suggest it would prevent 3,000 heart attacks and strokes, he said.
"That is one quality indicator and we looked at 32 indicators in all. A 90 per cent target for drug treatment is a realistic target," Dr Steel said.
Charities for the elderly condemned the findings, published yesterday in the British Medical Journal, and said they provided evidence that age discrimination was a significant problem.
The research team investigated the care delivered for 13 different conditions, including heart disease, diabetes, stroke, depression and osteoarthritis. Using questionnaires and face-to- face interviews, and covering both NHS and private care, they found wide variations in whether people received the right test, appropriate drug or proper care.
Treatment for heart disease was rated well, with 83 per cent of the appropriate care delivered. But for osteoarthritis the figure was just 29 per cent.
Dr Steel said: "A lot of the indicators were about quality of life rather than saving lives. The quality of care was poorest in conditions associated with disability and frailty, such as arthritis, incontinence, cataracts, hearing problems and osteoporosis. They are conditions in which an improvement in care can make a big difference."
The independent study of 8,688 people aged over 50 in England found that over all 13 conditions, 62 per cent of the care recommended for older adults was actually received. In geriatric conditions, barely half (57 per cent) was provided.
The authors note that conditions targeted with extra payments in the GPs' contract, introduced in 2004, were dealt with better. In 75 per cent of conditions that attracted payments, people got the right treatment, compared with 58 per cent who received the correct treatment where their condition was not covered by the contract. Geriatric conditions were not included in the contract.
Gordon Lishman, director general of Age Concern, said: "These figures show that age discrimination within the NHS is still rife."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments