Anger as world health body bans recruitment of smokers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The World Health Organisation (WHO) has provoked a furious row by announcing that people who smoke will automatically be banned from employment with the organisation.
Even job applicants who admit to using tobacco only occasionally will not be recruited by the organisation. Existing staff who smoke will be encouraged to kick their habit but will not lose their jobs if they do not give up.
The WHO said the move, which comes into force immediately, was based on its position as the head of the global campaign to reduce smoking rates across the world. But for once, both pro and anti-smoking groups in Britain were united in their condemnation of the move, calling it unfair and "foolish".
The UN agency employs around 2,400 people, mainly at its headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. The new policy will cover people who chew tobacco and those who use snuff tobacco as well as those who smoke it.
Simon Clark, of the pro-smoking group Forest, said: "I think it is very disturbing, because it suggests that smokers are fair game for the type of treatment that simply would not be acceptable if it was targeted at any other minority group. What are the WHO going to do next - ban fat people or people who drink too much?"
A spokesman for the anti-smoking charity Ash said: "We think this is rather foolish. We should not be persecuting people smoking but encouraging them to give up." Employees at Ash were not asked whether or not they smoked, he added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments