Games: Chess
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.This position (Horowitz-Denker, Philadelphia 1936) may be found in a new book of endgames, The Final Countdown by W Hajenius and H van Riemsdijk (Cadogan, pounds 10.99). For years, the orthodox view was that White won by a classic squeeze: 1.Kh7 Kf7 2.Kh8 Kf8 3.g5 and Black resigned, since 3...hxg5 4.hxg5 Kf7 5.Kh7 leads to the loss of the g-pawn. Hajenius and Riemsdijk, however, point out that Black can draw after 1.Kh7 with 1...h5!! when 2.gxh5 Kf7 3.h6 g6! 4.Kh8 Kf8 gets White nowhere, while 2.g5 Kh7 3.Kh8 Kg6! 4.Kg8 is stalemate.
White can win, starting with 1.g5! hxg5 2.Kxg5 Kf7 3.h5 Ke7 4.Kg6 Kf8 5.h6! Kg8! 6.Kh5! but the much praised moves 1.Kh7 and 2.Kh8 deserve only question marks.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments