Games: Bridge

Alan Hiron
Friday 05 June 1998 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"Third hand plays high" is a time-honoured piece of advice and, of course, like most such adages, it is right most of the time. Whether West would have been unable to judge the situation accurately if his partner had not followed the rule is another matter.

First, the actual events at the table. South opened One No-trump (16- 18 points) and North raised directly to game. West led !6 against Three No-trumps - an unattractive start but, with so many high cards, he felt that he would have to lead the suit sooner or later - and East's queen was overtaken by the king.

Even if the spade finesse was right, there were only eight tricks without touching the diamonds, so at trick two declarer led a sneaky #5 from hand. West, however, could count: once his partner had produced !Q, he could have at most a jack elsewhere. So West went in immediately with #A and laid down !A - perhaps his partner had started with !Q,10,x,x,x. Well, the ten fell and West played off !J and !9. That, however, was the end of the story and East's !5 was born to blush unseen.

The unusual play that might conceivably have led to South's defeat would have been for East to contribute a low card to the first trick. Now, if the play goes in the same way (a big if!), he can overtake !9 with his queen and cash the five for the setting trick.

In case you adopt this sort of play in future, look out! West might easily have led !6 from, say, !K,J,9,6 and then playing low at trick one would not prove a popular move.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in