Games: Backgammon

Chris Bray
Saturday 01 February 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

This was problem 3 in the Christmas quiz. Black to play 3-3. Should he play: (a) 7/1(2)* (b) 14/5, 10/7 (c) 5/2(2)*, 4/1(2)* (d) 14/2*

This is a difficult one. Black's plan is to escape the back man while extending his own 5-point prime to a full 6-point prime. The first part of the plan is more important. Note that the doubling cube is with White - which means that Black cannot win the game by doubling White out. White is in it to the end, whatever happens. When you have already doubled it is normally correct to be slightly more aggressive than usual to compensate for the lack of the cube. This position is no exception. So we can eliminate play (b) which picks up both of Black's loose blots but does little else to make progress.

One of the hitting plays is indicated, but which one? Play (d) is the pure play, keeping the 5-point prime and trying to extend it to the full 6-point prime. It's fine when it works, but when White hits the blot on the 2-point things can go wrong quickly. White's 5-point board is enough to make this play too risky. Play (a) is immediately safe (other than White entering with a double-2). However, if White enters and anchors with a 2 then Black still has a lot of work to do to win the game. It's good, but not the best.

This brings us to the apparently anti-positional play (c). This gives up the prime but has the huge advantage of putting two men on the bar, giving Black the precious time he needs to escape his back man. The other advantage of this play which is not immediately obvious is that Black will win many more gammons than with the other plays. These two factors combine to make this the best play by quite a long way. This is confirmed both by manual roll-outs and the roll-out feature of Jellyfish, the world's best backgammon program.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in