Nasa asks private companies to start making lunar landers for first human trips to the Moon in decades
Three companies with very different visions will race to build spacecraft
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nasa has asked three private companies to start making their lunar landers – with the winner taking the first humans to the Moon in decades.
The space agency has chosen three companies to develop their spacecraft, as part of its plan to send astronauts to the Moon in 2024, and use that as a base to head on to Mars.
The most successful of the three visions, all of which are quite different, will be chosen for Nasa's mission, administrator Jim Bridenstine announced.
The companies are SpaceX in Hawthorne, California, led by Elon Musk; Blue Origin in Kent, Washington, founded by Amazon's Jeff Bezos; and Dynetics, a Huntsville, Alabama, subsidiary of Leidos. Altogether, the contracts for the initial 10-month period total 967 million US dollars.
"This is the last piece that we need in order to get to the moon" by 2024, Mr Bridenstine said.
He noted it will be the first lunar lander since the last Apollo moon mission in 1972.
Over the next 10 months, each company will refine its concept and Nasa will decide which lander to test first.
Mr Bridenstine said Nasa will go with the company that has the highest probability of success by 2024.
Nasa will rely on its own Orion capsules and Space Launch System megarockets - still under development - to launch astronauts to the moon.
The two other companies, Boeing and Vivace, put in bids but were eliminated early on, leaving the three awarded contracts.
SpaceX's proposed Starship lander is so tall that astronauts will use an elevator to get to and from the lunar surface.
Blue Origin's version comes with a big ladder, according to artistic renderings. The Dynetics lander is so low to the ground that only a few steps are needed, like a front porch, a feature that Nasa gave high marks for safety and efficiency.
SpaceX is using its own Starship spacecraft - still under development in Texas - and its own rockets. Blue Origin and Dynetics are partnering with numerous subcontractors, including commercial launch companies.
Going commercial, Mr Bridenstine said, will drive down costs while increasing access.
It builds off of Nasa's commercial cargo and crew programs for the International Space Station.
Just last November, SpaceX and Blue Origin were among the companies that won contracts to make cargo deliveries to the moon.
Nasa wants the new Artemis moon-landing programme to be sustainable, unlike Apollo, with multiple missions and multiple locations on the lunar surface.
While only one company will carry the first woman and next man to the lunar surface, all three will participate over the long haul, officials noted.
By learning how to live and work on another world - the moon - Nasa will be better equipped to eventually send astronauts to Mars, Mr Bridenstine said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments