Apple says Spotify is being 'misleading' as row develops over payments on the iPhone
'After using the App Store for years to dramatically grow their business, Spotify seeks to keep all the benefits of the App Store ecosystem - including the substantial revenue that they draw from the App Store's customers - without making any contributions to that marketplace,' Apple's statement said
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Apple says Spotify is trying to keep all the benefits it offers, but without paying anything back, in an extraordinary response to a growing fight between the two firms.
The company's statement came after Spotify said that Apple was abusing the dominance that the iPhone gave it in a complaint to European regulators. It also established a website in which it said Apple was not being fair, keeping too much of the revenues from its subscribers for itself and banning Spotify from launching new products.
Spotify pointed to the 30 per cent tax that Apple charges on any purchases made through its own systems, arguing that cost should be reduced. It also suggested that Apple had banned it from launching new features, such as an Apple Watch app.
In response, Apple has accused Spotify of wrapping "financial motivations in misleading rhetoric", and that the company would not be the business it is today without the App Store.
"After using the App Store for years to dramatically grow their business, Spotify seeks to keep all the benefits of the App Store ecosystem - including the substantial revenue that they draw from the App Store's customers - without making any contributions to that marketplace," Apple's statement said.
"At the same time, they distribute the music you love while making ever-smaller contributions to the artists, musicians and songwriters who create it - even going so far as to take these creators to court.
"Spotify has every right to determine their own business model, but we feel an obligation to respond when Spotify wraps its financial motivations in misleading rhetoric about who we are, what we've built and what we do to support independent developers, musicians, songwriters and creators of all stripes."
The iPhone maker also argued that its 30% tax drops to a 15% cut after the first year, and that because the "majority" of Spotify customers use the free, advert-supported version of the app they made no contribution to App Store revenue.
Apple said only a "tiny fraction of their subscribers fall under Apple's revenue-sharing model. Spotify is asking for that number to be zero".
"Let's be clear about what that means," Apple's statement continued.
"Apple connects Spotify to our users. We provide the platform by which users download and update their app. We share critical software development tools to support Spotify's app building. And we built a secure payment system - no small undertaking - which allows users to have faith in in-app transactions. Spotify is asking to keep all those benefits while also retaining 100% of the revenue."
Apple also dismissed Spotify claims that it had blocked access to products and app upgrades, such as around voice assistant Siri and Apple Watch integration.
Apple labelled those accusations "surprising".
In a blog post outlining his company's position, Spotify chief executive Daniel Ek said Apple's rules were designed to "purposely limit choice and stifle innovation at the expense of the user experience".
"We aren't seeking special treatment," he wrote.
"We simply want the same treatment as numerous other apps on the App Store, like Uber or Deliveroo, who aren't subject to the Apple tax and therefore don't have the same restrictions."
He argued that the company was left with technical and experience-limiting restrictions imposed on it that stifled its ability to communicate with customers if they chose not to use Apple's payment system.
Additional reporting by agencies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments