Apple Watch prices could go up to $5,000 for solid 18k gold version - but that makes sense
With the Apple Watch, Apple wants to move from the technology sector to the world of luxury brands - where people will pay thousands just because
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When Apple unveiled the Apple Watch back in September they gave details for three separate models with prices starting “from $349”. It’s expensive for a smartwatch, said the experts, but this is Apple – since when have they ever made anything cheap?
Well, it turns out “from $349” might be just the start of it with Apple rumour-monger iGen.fr reporting that prices for the device will actually go up to $5,000 (£3,150) for the solid 18-karat gold model, while the stainless steel version is predicted to start at $500 (£310).
The authenticity of these prices its unknown (although iGen have had some hits in the past – including reporting the exact dimensions of the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus) but they do match what the experts are saying about the Apple Watch – especially if Apple wants to be the first tech company to never sell a smartwatch again: they just want to sell watches.
Long-time Apple watcher John Gruber even predicted prices like this back in September, pointing out that Apple was finally moving away from its long tradition of ‘accessible luxury’ where - to quote Andy Warhol - the “richest consumers buy essentially the same things as the poorest.”
“You can be watching TV and see Coca-Cola and you know that the President drinks Coke, Liz Taylor drinks Coke, and just think, you can drink Coke, too,” wrote Warhol back in 1975. “A Coke is a Coke and no amount of money can get you a better Coke than the one the bum on the corner is drinking.”
This is true of the iPhone and the iPad – but it won’t be true of the Apple Watch. As Adam Fields summed up the situation on Medium: “There’s a gold version [of the watch] whose only substantial differentiating feature is that it’s more expensive. Because it’s “gold” and not “gold-colored”, it’s not just a style choice, it’s a lifestyle choice.”
Gruber adds that even if you just sold the gold in the ‘Edition’ Apple Watch to be melted down it would still fetch a couple of thousand dollars at least, and when you compare the price difference between regular- and solid gold-Rolexes (add at least $10,000 for the soft, yellow stuff and then start climbing) then $5,000 might actually be relatively sane.
In an industry where functionality has always been the most important factor (at least that’s what companies tend to claim about their products) Apple has long been unusual for selling ‘lifestyle’ products. Now, with the ‘Watch’, that transition might be complete – and you’ll see what it’s really like when Apple starts making money.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments