Pong-ee! Amol Rajan tries the new Walker's potato crisps

Our writer, a bi-weekly restaurant critic for the Independent on Sunday (and not a massive crisp fan) tries the new "real food flavours" crisps

Amol Rajan
Wednesday 27 February 2013 19:39 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The first thing that strikes you about tasting commercially manufactured crisps of any kind is the aroma. And these are no different.

Open either of the packets and it’s like, Pow! Whoosh! and Pong-ee! Foul vapours rise up to the nostrils, like the windy excretions of a cat without a conscience. All crisps stink: as little more than starchy agglomerations of grease and salt, they need to fool us into thinking they’re vehicles for genuine flavour, “real” or otherwise.

Crisp A (new school; “with cheddar from Somerset”): I’m getting transfats, notes of leek, a dominant, musty flavour coming through, more chimney than cheddar; more Somers Town than Somerset.

…A glug of water between courses…

Crisp 2 (old school; think Gary Lineker): much stronger flavour here; more grease, more salt, more whatever the opposite of mouthwash is; full on soot, in fact.

What I’m tasting in both cases is starch, oil, and salt. The old crisp, being artificially stimulated, makes a bigger, badder impact. But neither have serious pretensions to actual flavour. Alas for Walkers, the new crisps, like the old crisps, don’t taste of very much at all, though in fairness I could swear the aftertaste carried a faint whiff of something familiar. Could it be horse meat?*

*No. It's definitely not horse meat.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in