Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Pringle is undoubtedly crisp - but it is not a potato crisp. That was the conclusion reached by a High Court judge today after an exhaustive inquiry into the ingredients, manufacturer and packaging of the top-selling snack.
The result of Mr Justice Warren's ruling is that regular Pringles, in their various flavours, are free from VAT.
The judge allowed an appeal by manufacturers Proctor & Gamble against a VAT Tribunal decision that Pringles should be standard-rated at 17.5 per cent as falling within the definition "potato crisps, potato sticks, potato puffs and similar products made from the potato, or from potato flour, or from potato starch".
Proctor & Gamble stands to save millions of pounds on UK sales of Pringles. Worldwide sales of the snack, in its distinctive tube packaging, are reckoned to reach £500 million.
Most foodstuffs are zero-rated for VAT, but Revenue and Customs argued that Pringles fell within the "potato crisp" exception.
Procter & Gamble pointed out that, unlike potato crisps, Pringles had a regular shape "not found in nature" as well as a uniform colouring and texture and a "mouth melt" taste.
Crisps did not contain non-potato flours like Pringles and were not normally packaged in tubes.
And customers did not regard Pringles as potato crisps.
Mr Justice Warren ruled that Pringles were not "made from the potato" within the definition laid down by the 1994 VAT Act.
To fall within the exception, a product "must be wholly, or substantially wholly, made from the potato".
Pringles, he said, were made from potato flour, corn flour, wheat starch and rice flour together with fat and emulsifier, salt and seasoning, with a potato content of around 42 per cent.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments