Bartenders find new method for creating the iconic Ramos gin fizz
I like a Ramos when it’s perfectly made, but maybe more, I like the basic template: the spirit balanced with sour and sweet, the richness of cream and yes – I do love the pillowy cloud of foam, says M Carrie Allan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I think of the Ramos gin fizz as the Mount Everest of drinks. Not because it is extraordinarily difficult to make, or because it represents the pinnacle of cocktail achievement, but because of mountaineer George Mallory’s famous response about why he wanted to climb Everest: because it’s there.
The Ramos, a cool column of citrus and gin topped with a white plateau of foam, is perhaps the most iconic in the family of fizzes. It was possibly invented and definitely made famous by Henry C Ramos, a saloonkeeper in New Orleans in the early 20th century.
An early example of the celebrity bartender, Ramos was known for the high standards and decorum he insisted upon at his bar. Chris McMillian of Revel Cafe & Bar in New Orleans, himself a fourth-generation bartender and co-founder of the Museum of the American Cocktail, says that part of the enduring Ramos legend includes a story that when temperance crusader and bar-hatcheter Carry Nation saw how Ramos ran his establishment, she purportedly said that if all liquor purveyors were like him, there would be no need for prohibition.
His good behaviour clearly wasn’t enough to turn the tide, though. When the law came down, he closed up shop. “It’s long been my contention that nobody alive has ever drunk the true Ramos gin fizz, because Henry Ramos closed his doors in 1919 – 100 years ago this year – with the advent of prohibition,” says McMillian.
He notes that Ramos once said in an interview that no one could get drunk off Ramos gin fizzes. “I’ll postulate because it took so long to get one,” McMillian quips.
To be clear: these days, the Ramos is famous primarily for being a pain in the – excuse me – for being what we might, in a person, describe as “high maintenance”. Per Stanley Clisby Arthur’s 1937 book Famous New Orleans Drinks and How to Mix ’Em, the original had nine ingredients: a tablespoon of powdered sugar (simple syrup is more common these days), a few drops of orange flower water (a highly fragrant distillate whose nose is far more flowers than oranges), lime and lemon juice, a jigger of gin, cream, egg white, seltzer and a few drops of vanilla extract (that last is listed as optional).
That shopping list makes it fussy enough, but its reputation is due more to the technique used to combine those ingredients: various historical accounts suggest that, to achieve the drink’s silken texture and high-top fade of foam, bartenders shook it for north of 10 minutes.
At Ramos’s establishment, its creation employed a line of men, each shaking the drink until he tired and passed it on to the next. Arthur, describing the scene: “The corps of busy shaker boys behind the bar was one of the sights of the town during Carnival, and in the 1915 Mardi Gras, 35 shaker boys nearly shook their arms off but were still unable to keep up with the demand.”
This anecdote strikes me as a great example of early bar myth-building – the pre-prohibition equivalent of drinks that change colour or have an elaborate scaffolding of garniture on top. In an era when you couldn’t lure customers in with cocktail eye candy on Instagram, what better way to draw crowds than with a drink that would send customers out talking about the show before the sip?
The legend of the Ramos has driven bartenders to treat it as an Everest of sorts and devise various means of scaling it: changing up that long shake time, using different sizes and shapes of ice, using a blender, changing up the order of shaking with and without ice. At a couple of bars, I’ve even encountered a machine that holds two shakers and agitates them for minutes on end. At around $1,000 a pop, they seem extreme, but they did make me hope that “Terminator 16: Rise of the Ramos Machines” – in which a resentful robot travels back through time to force Sarah Connor to make her own cocktails – might be somewhere in our future.
I am willing to work for a good drink. But the reality is that I’ll be making these cocktails myself, and let’s just say that when God was handing out upper body strength, I had gone back to the freckles line for a second helping.
Happily, most bartenders I’ve chatted with about the Ramos seem to concur that extreme shake times aren’t necessary. These days, many have gravitated towards a method called the reverse dry shake, in which you shake the drink first with ice to chill and dilute it, then strain out the ice and re-shake it, whipping up the egg and cream back to that silken texture without the ice melt to interfere. Few find it necessary to give it more than three minutes’ shaking.
Personally, I’ve found Ramoses (Ramosi? Ramosen?) that fail do so less because of under-shaking and more because of an overly generous hand with the orange flower. A few sparing droplets produce a subtle, pleasant florality; a few drops more and your Ramos will taste like you’ve been spritzed in the mouth by one of the perfume snipers who lurk in the cosmetics sections of fancy department stores.
At Hank’s Cocktail Bar in Washington, beverage programme manager Hunter Douglas does a reverse dry shake, puts the drink back in the refrigerator for a minute or so, and only then gently adds the modicum of soda that raises the foam above the rim. “You don’t want to break that souffle on top,” he says. Douglas apparently feels even more strongly about orange flower water than I do; he leaves it out entirely, instead finishing the drink with a mist of orange extract. It’s a lovely variation – as is his berry-brightened Becky’s back at it, which provides an echo of the Ramos, minus the fizz.
That fizz is another element that can sink the drink, ironically in the process of trying to raise it. Because the visual of that high-hat foam has become such a focus, sometimes people add too much soda to get it. By adding just a little soda, “you’re not so diluting the drink ... as to mask the gin to the point that you can no longer recognise it,” McMillian says. “And once the botanical elements of the gin become the central flavour element, then it becomes a delicious and complex drink with many layers of flavour.”
I like a Ramos when it’s perfectly made, but maybe more, I like the basic template: the spirit balanced with sour and sweet, the richness of cream, and yes – I do love the pillowy cloud of foam. Once you master it, you can take it in all sorts of directions. And I’m grateful to have a means to create it that doesn’t require exhaustion or repetitive stress injuries. After all, if your milkshake is going to bring all the boys to the yard, wouldn’t you like to have some energy left for socialising when they arrive?
© Washington Post
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments