Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tattoo parlours and clients warned to be wary of contaminated ink that can cause infections

A batch of contaminated ink has been re-called in in-home tattoo kits

Kashmira Gander
Friday 08 August 2014 18:52 BST
Comments
A sign advertises tattooing and piercing in London
A sign advertises tattooing and piercing in London (Oli Scarff/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tattoo parlours and their clients have been urged to be wary of a re-called batch of tattoo ink that can cause infections.

While unsanitary parlours have given unwitting clients hepatitis, staph infections, and even MRSA, a US agency has discovered a brand of ink carrying bacteria that could pass infections in even the cleanest parlour.

After testing inks sold as part of in-home tattoo kits marketed by White and Blue Lion, Inc., the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) confirmed it had found infectious bacteria in unopened bottles of the company’s inks.

The products were recalled on 11 July, but the body is concerned that bottles may have been mistakenly sold on.

One person has been infected after using the company’s tattoo products, according to Linda Katz, director of FDA’s Office of Cosmetics and Colours, while the agency is aware of other reports linked to tattoo products in similar packaging.

“We are aware of other reports linked to tattoo products with similar packaging,” she said.

Permanent tattoos – both traditional body artwork and makeup – are made by using needles to inject coloured ink below the surface of the skin.

Infected ink can cause a range of problems, including redness, swelling, weeping wounds, blemishes, and excessive pain in the area. The FDA has also received reports of side-effects that have taken years to materialise.

Those who experience any of these symptoms are advised to immediately seek medical attention

Even a local infection can cause a person to become permanently scarred, while untreated infections can cause sepsis – where the contamination spreads through the bloodstream. These infections may be associated with fever, shaking chills (rigors) and sweats. If these symptoms arise, treatment with antibiotics, hospitalisation and or surgery can be the outcome.

Those most at risk include people with pre-existing heart or circulatory disease, diabetes or compromised immune systems, Katz explained.

To avoid using or being tattooed with contaminated ink, the body has advised artists, suppliers and customers of tattoo ink to be wary of: packaging without a brand name; bottles with a dragon tattoo and or without the name and place of business of the manufacturer or distributor. Bottles marked with “Lotch” [sic] and Batch numbers, and “Date produced” and “Best if used by” dates could also pose a risk.

“If you’re buying tattoo inks or getting a tattoo from a professional tattoo artist, you should first examine the products to determine whether the inks or kits meet the above descriptions,” cautioned Katz.

Epidemiologist Katherine Hollinger, from the Office of Cosmetics and Colours, added that consumers and tattoo and permanent make-up artists should take certain precautions and to urge potentially infected clients to seek medical care.

“Reporting an infection to FDA and the artist is important in order for FDA to investigate, and to enable the artist to take steps to prevent others from becoming infected,” she said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in